Grace and Peace.
Saturday, May 14, 2011
Lying on a cold and icy deck in Cloudcroft in late December
Grace and Peace.
Thursday, August 26, 2010
Flood Story
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Change
They caused me to have all sorts of questions, especially my senior year of high school I was sick and tired of this Christianity thing, I wanted nothing to do with it. I could sit in Bible class and give all the right answers and perhaps even knew more than the teacher but it was a simple mental exercise. I wouldn't say that I was no longer a Christians but I was certainly looking for any reason to not believe in God; I guess perhaps if I looked a little harder, read some of the leading atheists writings I would have found some answers. But in order to make a long story short: here I am six hours short of graduating from Lubbock Christian University with a B.A. in Biblical Text.
(I should warn you now that in blog posts I am scatter-brained and leave some thoughts less developed than others, so if you want more info just ask me).
Back to change. I simply feel like sharing with you some of my beliefs that have been challenged and changed (in no specific order):
- Context. Context matters, no matter what people tell you. Context always matters. Bad theology comes from proof-texting, which is essentially taking a verse out of context and using it to support your own idea. It seems to be epidemic in churches today, pastors practicing eisegesis (reading into the text) instead of practicing exegesis (out of) and allowing the text to speak for itself. This seems to be popular in trying to harmonize the seven sayings of Jesus on the cross. We need to realize that for the most part the people who authored the text of the Bible were not stupid, they were brilliant. Context matters, the author of Matthew was not trying to emphasize the same thing as the author of Mark or the author of Luke. They each were writing to a specific audience with a specific purpose and agenda in mind, so let's not do them a disservice by harmonizing their writings.
- (In)errancy. Articles XI and XII of the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy specifically state that Scripture is infallible and inerrant. Unfortunately, it seems that a lot of people fall into bibliolatry where they hold the Bible in higher regards than God, or treat the Bible as God. Now, I am not insisting that the Bible teaches falsehood or is deceitful but we have to realize that the books contained in the Bible were written over the course of hundreds of years by 40 or more different people, all with certain agendas. I firmly believe that they were inspired by God to write what they did but people do make mistakes. Fortunately, these mistakes are minor and do not alter the salvific significance that can be found in the text of the Bible but nevertheless and mistake is a mistake.
- Women. To be more specific: Women in ministry. God has created all humanity equal. "God made them male and female." If we are honest with how we read the New Testament I don't see how anyone could deny the significant role that women played in ministry in the early church. First, Paul charges Phoebe with the responsibility to deliver Romans to Rome and surrounding regions. Basically, she had to read Paul's writing and defend it, answer questions, essentially teach. Second, Priscilla seems to be a dominant woman minister. The way two people are introduced is significant in Ancient Near Eastern writings. Barnabas and Saul, Barnabas was obviously the significant one at the time. Paul and Barnabas, emphasis now lays on Paul. Priscilla is first introduced with Aquila being the dominant person "Aquila and Priscilla," then it is "Priscilla and Aquila." We should not limit God because of gender.
- Creation. (I am running out of steam and this is a long post so I will keep it short). I think it is important for us to welcome a new era where science and faith can peacefully dialogue, in which each community can learn from one another. Genesis 1-2 is not a scientific account of creation and should not be read as one, it is poetic literature and should be read in light of other Mesopotamian creation myths.
- Arminianism. I am willing to agree to disagree with my Calvinist friends. But it simply seems that the Grand Narrative of Scripture does not have God randomly selecting people for heaven and for hell. It is by God's grace that we are saved.
Thursday, September 10, 2009
God help us
But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far away have been brought near by the blood of Christ. For he himself is our peace, who has made the two one and has destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility, by setting aside in his flesh the law with its commands and regulations. His purpose was to create in himself one new humanity out of the two, thus making peace, and in one body to reconcile both of them to God through the cross, by which he put to death their hostility. He came and preached peace to you who were far away and peace to those who were near. For through him we both have access to the Father by one Spirit.
There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Lord, You are both kind and merciful.
We patiently await for the day when our weapons
will be formed into objects used for the good of all humanity.
We earnestly seek You for the day when one nation
no longer rises up against another,
make us instruments of your peace.
How great you are, Sovereign Lord!
There is no one like you,
and there is no God but you!
Cleanse our hearts from injustice,
that we might fight against injustice.
Cleanse our hearts from corruption and hatred,
teach us to be pure and loving.
We look forward to that day when heaven comes down,
when you inhabit our presence,
when you re-create this earth and we join in.
But may we start now for the healing of the nations.
All glory and honor you, forever and ever. Amen
Monday, August 31, 2009
Church
Monday, August 10, 2009
War
There is a war. This war is like all wars, bloody and violent, born out of corruption and selfishness. This war has been fought on multiple continents, involving all ethnicities, lasting for decades, centuries, even millennia. Each side has a leader: one leader represents all things beautiful: hope, justice, redemption, healing, forgiveness, humility, peace and life; the other leader represents all things despicable and hostile, putting selfish greed above all, using manipulation and coercion to deceive others into submission, turning good into bad, twisting the truth, this leader is divisive leading to death and destruction.
The two leaders went head-to-head (or heel-to-head).
The evil leader had this unquenchable blood-thirst; the onlooker would have perceived that the evil leader had won, had crushed all hopes of peace and redemption.
Something happened while the evil leader celebrated, the good leader redeemed all and offered grace for all. The one that had succumbed to such a violent act had actually won. Through his life and his death and through his life after life after death he offered redemption, restoration, hope, peace, justice, grace, forgiveness and love for all.
The Scriptures say:
“Death has been swallowed up in victory.”
“Where, O death, is your victory?
Where, O death, is your sting?”
The key leader has been defeated, although not destroyed or done away with. He still believes that he has a chance. His outposts still fight this war, this war that has already been won. They continually fight against peace and life, they desire death and destruction for all.
Jesus brought hope and grace for all of humanity. Followers of Christ must offer the same. So go and do likewise.
Thursday, July 30, 2009
The Divine Dance
What follows is an excerpt from a paper I wrote in my freshman theology class. The paper is titled "The Holy Trinity," in it I briefly discuss some of the different forms of the Trinity, how the doctrine of the Trinity was formed, some heresy, and some different views that might possibly be acceptable in our ever advancing egalitarian society. Please feel free to comment, criticize, agree, whatever; if you would like to read more then please let me know and I will post more of the paper on here.
THE DIVINE DANCE
The subject of how we view God is of great importance and should not be ignored however I find the subject of how the Trinity acts within itself of even greater importance and interest. This deals with how the Father relates to the Son, and how the Son relates to the Holy Spirit and then connects them all and switches everything around. The usual Western view of the Trinity is described in a psychological analogy which deals with differentiated personhood but inseparable activities; the Eastern view, which is accepted and advocated by many contemporary theologians, is the “social analogy that takes the human experience of life-in-relationship as the best clue to an understanding of the triune life of God.”[1] I enjoy the idea and theory of this social analogy because of its focus on the relationship of things, I believe God is all about relationships and therefore we can more accurately view the Trinity through a relational-type view. A way to view this relationship can be described by the use of the Greek word perichoresis, which is discussed and defined both in Migliore and Grudem. Perichoresis can be described as a “mutual indwelling” or “being-in-one-another.” [2] Very vivid imagery is used when describing perichoresis, often times it is referred to as the divine dance, it actually means “to dance around.” [3] This is a very intimate way of describing how the Trinity interacts and participates with and in itself. As a dance between human partners takes place they encircle each other and weave in and out between each other; in the divine dance the partners move in such an intimate way that they move in and through each other. We automatically know who the dancers are in the divine dance but it is not of the greatest importance of knowing the dancers as it is of knowing the actual patterns of dance itself. Just as an example, “the son ‘indwells’ the father, the father ‘contains’ the son, the spirit ‘fills’ the father.” [4] If we are to think of the Trinity as being a dance, then we are forced to ask the question of where do we, as humans, as the created, fit in. Are we the audience, only observing this dance? I must answer this with a no, we have such a troubled time understanding certain attributes and qualities of God that I feel he would not place us on the outside of this dance, this would deny the fact that God wants to have a relationship with us.
So if we are not on the outside then we must be participating in this dance. But to what extent are we participating? And at what limit can we no longer participate in this dance? I will do my best to accurately answer these questions however I feel that for each person there would be a different answer. There are two approaches I would like to take with answering this question. The first would be to view this through the Western view of the divine dance which is that of communion. This is a circle dance, where each person is of the nature of God, there is no centrality to this circle. The problem is obvious with this, if it is a circle then is there any possible way for others to enter into the circle. For some odd reason, growing up in the West, I am slowly finding out that I tend to view the Eastern way of thinking more than the Western way of thought. The eastern view states that “participants move outside the inner circle of dancers to make contact with them.” [5] After they have moved out they possess the ability to bring others back in with them. The best possible way that I can come up to picture this would be a fountain, which can also be compared with the spring analogy previously mentioned above. However, in the fountain sits a body of water, which slowly makes its way out of the fountain, into the air and then back into the body of water. This illustration obviously has flaws but should be sufficient in demonstrating the interconnectedness and participation that takes place within the Trinity and with us in the Trinity. I hope that I have been able to accurately explain my views in relation to the divine dance.
[1] Daniel L. Migliore, Faith Seeking Understanding: An Introduction to Christian Theology (2nd ed.; Michigan; William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2004), 78.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Fiddes, Paul S. Fall 2006. Participating in the Trinity. Perspectives in Religious Studies. 33 (3):375-391.
[4] Ibid.
[5] Ibid.